Radiometric dating methods flaws
Radiometric dating methods flaws - Cratun sex video
There are three main assumptions that must be made to accept radiometric dating methods.These must be accepted on faith in uniformitarian and naturalistic frameworks.
Finally, many scientists have never encountered a reason to distrust radiodating.
Geology textbooks do not explain its shortcomings, so scientists are not taught to question the results of radiodating.
Often after ICR events, scientists will express surprise that they had achieved advanced degrees without ever hearing the specific, legitimate reasons to distrust radiodating.
Most scientists and many Christians believe that the radiometric dating methods prove that the earth is 4.5 billion years old.
The textbooks speak of the radiometric dating techniques, and the dates themselves, as factual information.
Secular scientists trust the million-year time ranges that faulty radiodating methods present for at least four reasons.
First, long ages fit their belief that natural processes, not God, generated man, life, the earth, and the universe.
Knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming?
For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.” For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water, by which the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water.
Whenever this information is presented to a live audience, someone usually asks the next question.
Q: If radiodating can be scientifically falsified, then why do most scientists continue to trust these flawed methods?
The Bible gives us a much more reliable history of the earth as it was recorded by God.